Prague in 1920s, The Linguistic Circle of Prague and Sergej Karcevskij's paper "Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique" with Note, 1 March 2015

Prague in 1920s, The Linguistic Circle of Prague and Sergej Karcevskij's paper "Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique"

From Print 2012, Chapter 18

Non-symmetry. It was the very theme that I repeatedly talked on with C. Prague in 1920s. Karcevskij's paper "Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique" that appeared in the magazine TCLP.  Absolutely contradicted coexistence between flexibility and solidity, which language keeps on maintaining, by which language continues existing as language.  Still now there will exist the everlasting dual contradiction in language. Why can
language stay in such solid and such flexible condition like that. Karcevskij proposed the duality that is seemed to be almost absolute contradiction.
Sergej Karcevskij's best of papers, for whom C called as the only genius in his last years' book Janua Linguisticae reserata 1994. 

Source: Tale / Print by LI Koh / 27 January 2012 

Reference:

• Fortuitous Meeting, What CHINO Eiichi Taught Me in the Class of Linguistics / 5 December 2004

Reference 2:

• Linguistic Circle of Prague / 13 July 2012 - 19 July 2012

References 3:

• Note for KARCEVSKIJ Sergej's "Du dualisme asymetrique du signe linguistique" / 8 September 2011
• Condition of Meaning / 11 September 2011

References 4:

• Dimension of Language / 4 September 2013
• Synthesis of Meaning and Transition of Dimension / 6 September 2013

Reference 5:

• Reversion Conjecture Revised / 1 May 2014 - 20 May 2014

[Note, 2 October 2014]
In this Tale, Print 2012, C is CHINO Eiichi who was the very teacher in my life, taught me almost all the heritage of modern linguistics. I first met him in 1969 at university's his Russian class as a student knowing nothing on language study.

• From Distance to Pseudo-Kobayashi Distance / 5 February 2012

[Note, 1 March 2015]

Heritage of The Linguistic Circle of Prague in 1920s

The LCP showed us the eternal flexibility of language, which has overcame the vast trial approach to language and its bases and language universals.  The LCP had never persisted one or the main stream theories. I have inherited this noble spirit on my study.