Google tag

Monday, 10 February 2025

The root of language is in the discreteness. / All the information of language are generated from this simple structure which supposition is derived from Flux Conjecture, Lemma 1 and Lemma 2. 2014-2019 / With Note 2020

 The root of language is in the discreteness. / All the information of language are generated from this simple structure which supposition is derived from Flux Conjecture, Lemma 1 and Lemma 2. 2014-2019 / With Note 2020

This paper has some erratum by web’s ability.
Please refer to the texts of

ENSILA , srflnote and sekinanwiki Floer Homology Language
at the next.



https://ensila.website2.me/tanaka-akio/root-of-language-20-september-2014

https://srflnote.webnode.com/news/root-of-language-20-september-2014/?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=paste&utm_campaign=copypaste&utm_content=https%3A%2F%2Fsrflnote.webnode.com%2Fnews%2Froot-of-language-20-september-2014%2F

https://writer.zohopublic.com/writer/published/b0tmj4851f52a297f4b92b6aadb91fb9c51a0


Root of Language / 20 September 2014

May 23, 2019
Root of Language / 20 September 2014
20/09/2014 10:02 
Root of Language


TANAKA Akio


The root of language is in the discreteness. All the information of language are generated from this simple structure which supposition is derived from Flux Conjecture, Lemma 1 and Lemma 2.

.........................................................................................................................................

Floer Homology Language 
TANAKA Akio 
     
​
 
Note 8 
 
Discreteness of Language​
​
​
Flux Conjecture​
(Lalonde-McDuff-Polterovich 1998)​
Image of Flux homomorphism is discrete at H1(M; R).​
​
Lemma 1​
Next two are equivalent.​
(i) Flux conjecture is correct.​
(ii) All the complete symplectic homeomorphism is C1 topological closed at symplectic 
transformation group.​
​
Lemma 2​
Next two are equivalent.​
(1) Flux conjecture is correct.​
 (ii) Diagonal set M
M×M is stable by the next definition.​ ​ Definition​ L is stable at the next condition.​ (i) There exist differential 1 form u1, u2 over L that is sufficiently small.​ (ii) When sup|u1|, sup|u2| is Lu1Lu2 for u1, u2 ,there existsf that satisfies u1 - u2  = df .​ ​ Explanation​ 0 ​ ​   is de Rham cohomology class.​ ​ Symplectic manifold     (M, w)​ Group's connected component of complete homeomorphism       Ham (M, w)​ Flux isomorphism     Flux: π1(Ham(M, w) )→ R​ Road of Ham (M, w)     γ(t)​ δγ / δt = Xu(t) that is defined bu closed differential form Utover M​ ​ Explanation​ 1​ Symplectic manifold     M​ n-dimensional submanifold      L M​ L that satisfies next condition is called special Lagrangian submanifold.​ Ω's restriction to L is L's volume. ​ ​ 2​ M's special Lagrangian submanifold     L​ Flat complex line bundle     L​ LAGsp(M)     (L, L)​ ​ 3​ Complex manifold      M†​ p M†​ Sheaf over M†     fp​ fp (U) = C ( pU)​ fp (U) = 0 ( p U)​ ​ 4​ Special Lagrangian fiber bundle     π : M → N​ Complementary dimension 2's submanifold     S(N) N​ π-1 (p) = LP​ Pair     (Lp, Lp)​ pN-S(N)​ Lp      Complex flat line bundle​ All the pair (Lp, Lp) s is M0† .​ ​ 5​ (Geometric mirror symmetry conjecture Strominger-Yau-Zaslow 1996)​ Mirror of M is diffeomorphic with compactification of M0† .​ ​ 6 ​ Pairs of Lagrangian submanifold of M and flat U(1) over the submanifold     (L1, L1), (L2, L2)​ (L1, L1)  (L2, L2) means the next.​ There exists complete symplectic homeomorphism that is ψ(L2 ) = L2​ and​ ψ*L2 is isomorphic with L1.​ ​ ​ ​ Impression​ Discreteness of language is possible by Flux conjecture 1998.​ ​ ​ ​ [References]​ Quantization of Language / Floer Homology Language / Note 7 / June 24, 2009​ For WITTGENSTEIN Ludwig / Position of Language / Tokyo December 10, 2005​ ​ ​ ​ To be continued​ Tokyo July 19, 2009​ Sekinan Research Field of Language​ ​ ​   Back to sekinanlogoshome  ​ ................................................................................................................ Source:  Floer Homology Language / Note 8 / Discreteness of Language / 19 July 2009   Tokyo 20 September 2014 Sekinan Research Field Of Language Read more: https://srflnote.webnode.com/news/root-of-language-20-september-2014/
Root of Language Note

TANAKA Akio

22 February 2020
SRFL Paper

Floer Homology Language 
Note 8  Discreteness of Language​ shows a root of language.
But I think, at least, that the inevitably needed factor must be given at present, when I wrote a paper
titled Quantum-Nerve Theory 2019.
The must factor is energy, which gives various responses at the presentation of language phenomena.
I ever arranged papers related with energy at the next. 

Preparation for the energy of language
May 14, 2019
Preparation for the energy of language

The energy of language seems to be one of the most fundamental theme for the further step-up  study on language at the present for me. But the theme was hard to put on the mathematical description. Now I present some preparatory  papers written so far.

Potential of Language / Floer Homology Language / Potential of Language / 16 June 2009

Homology structure of Word / Floer Homology Language /Homology Structure of Word / Tokyo June 16, 2009

Amplitude of meaning minimum / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / 17 December 2008

Time of Word / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory / 23 December 2008
 
Tokyo
14 May 2019
ENSILA

22 February 2020
SRFL Paper


Read more: https://geometrization-language.webnode.page/news/the-root-of-language-is-in-the-discreteness-all-the-information-of-language-are-generated-from-this-simple-structure-which-supposition-is-derived-from-flux-conjecture-lemma-1-and-lemma-2-2014-2019-with-note-2020/

Escalator Language Theory Turning Point of Time 2006

 


Escalator Language Theory
 
Turning Point of Time
 
For SINGER Isaac Bashevis, WHEN SHLEMIEL WENT TO WARSAW AND OTHER STORIES
 
TANAKA Akio
 
 
1 Time has symmetry.
2 Time consists of the two, real time and imaginary time.
3 Real time is appeared time.
4 Imaginary time is hidden time.
5 Time is recognized by square.
Unit of real time is expressed by t2 = 1.
Unit of imaginary time is expressed by t2 = -1.
6 Real time makes future.
Imaginary time makes past.
Present is expressed by t2 = 0.
7 Time is on escalator belt.
8 Escalator belt has one Turing point of time.
9 Turning point of time is expressed by t2 + x2 + y2 + z2 = r2. Here r is radius of turning point.
10 Turning point of time is smooth and continuously differentiable.
11 Escalator belt has not self-intersection.
12 When time passes, real time and imaginary time are counted.
Real time is visible. Imaginary time is invisible.
13 The belt is in bulky space.
14 Real time is at real number’s coordinate in the space.
Imaginary time is at imaginary number’s coordinate in the space.
15 Real time and imaginary time is symmetrical for coordinate axis.

 
Tokyo December 22, 2006



Read more: https://srfl-collection.webnode.com/news/escalator-language-theory-turning-point-of-time-2006/

Language and I 2017

 

Language and I




Sekinan Library has researched on language from 1986 and successively at SRFL from 2003.
Papers and essays that have been  written at Sekinan Library and SRFL Sekinan Research Field of Language 
are shown and searched at SRFL Essay and SRFL Paper.
Sekinan Library's main theme is now at language universals that has been a hard target and researched since 1920s at Linguistic Circle of Prague, but the theme had been always put aside from the centre of the study.
In Japan. on Prague School CHINO Eiichi probably first introduced systematically through his direct study experience at Prague between 1958 and 1964.

I first met with him in 1969 at Tokyo, from whom received Russian language lesson at the beginner's small class.
And after some 10 years I again met him in 1979 at his lecture on structural linguistics, to which I listen till till March 1986 when I get apart from the university.

In 1986 I also started to study my own object on language, in  which the main theme  was language universals by mathematical description, surging from Nicolas Bourbaki, that were already applied to wide and deep approach even at human studies at that time.

For me algebraic geometry was the great aid to deepen the theme, to which from 1920s many researchers have recognised one of the most important but hard to operate with clear description at the field of philology.

In 2003 I narrowly wrote up the trial paper on language's characters, at that time not for total language, but I got the steady way to approach the hard target of language's basis mainly on meaning, through which I faintly could see the final target, language universals.


Tokyo
26 June 2017

Sekinan Library

Stochastic Meaning Theory 4 / Energy of Language / For ZHANG Taiyan and Wenshi 908 / 2008

 


Stochastic Meaning Theory 4

Energy of Language
For ZHANG Taiyan and Wenshi 1908

TANAKA Akio

1
Domain     Λ∈R3
Substantial particles     N-number m-mass 
Particles are assumed to Newton dynamics.
Place coordinate of particle i in N-number particles     ri∈Λ
Momentum of particle     pi∈R3
State at a moment     γ = (r1, …, rN, p1, …, pN)
Set of state γ     PΛ, N ≃ΛN ×R3N⊂R6N
PΛ, N is called phase space.
2
Volume     V
Particles     n- mol
Energy     U  
Parameter space     E
Point of E     ( U, V, n )
3
Subspace     PΛ, N ( U )
Volume of PΛ, N ( U )     WΛ, N ( U )
4
Adiabatic operation      ( U, V, n ) →  ( U’, V’, n’ )
Starting state of γ∈PΛ, N
Ending state of γ∈PΛ’, N
Map of time development    f
5
Volume of PΛ’, N ( U’ )     WΛ’, N ( U’ )
Volume of f (PΛ, N ( U ) ) is equivalent to WΛ, N ( U ).
f (PΛ, N ( U ) ) is subspace of PΛ’, N ( U’ )
WΛ, N ( U ) ≤ WΛ’, N ( U’ )
6
Equilibrium state     ( U, V, n )
Another equilibrium state       ( U’, V’, n’ )
Two volume of equilibrium states are seemed to be one state at phase space     WΛ, N ( U ) WΛ’, N’ ( U’ )
Operation of logarithm of equilibrium state at phase space     S ( U, V, n ) = k log WΛ, N ( U ) , (k ; arbitrary constant)
7
Phase space     2n- dimension
Differential 2-form    ω
Local coordinate     qi, pi
ω = ∑ni=1d qi, ∧dpi
ω is called symplectic form.
2n- dimensional manifold     M
Pair    (M, ω)
(M, ω) that satisfies the next is called symplectic manifold.
(i) dω = 0
(ii) ωn ≠0
Phase space is expressed by symplectic manifold.
8
Hamiltonian system
Coordinate    ( q, p ) = (q1, …, qn, p1, …, pn )
Phase space     R2n
C1 class function     H = (q, p, t )
 = ( 1≤i ≤n )
 = ( 1≤i ≤n )
9
An assumption from upper 8
H : = Sentence
q : = Place where word exists
p : = Momentum of word
t : = Time at which sentence is generated
10
Equilibrium state of sentence     H
Another equilibrium state of sentence     H’
Adiabatic process of language     H → H’
Entropy of language     S
H → H’ ⇔ S (H ) ≤ S (H’ )

[References]
Warp Theory / Tokyo October 24, 2004
Quantum Warp Theory Warp / Tokyo December 31, 2005

To be continued
Tokyo July 24, 2008

Hyperbolic Language. Connection of Words 2012


Connection of Words
1.
C is complex plane.
 is unit disk which centre is the origin of C.
z, w are the two points of  .
Hyperbolic distance  between z and w are defined by the next. ,  .
2.
M is complex manifold.
x, y are arbitrary points of M.
fv is finite sequence of regular curve.
Point zv is  .
 ,  .
 .
{  } is called regular chain.
Kobayashi pseudodistance dM is defined by the next.

 .
3.
[Interpretation on 2.]
 := Meaning minimum of word.
dM := Distance of word.
M:= Word.
4.
[Definition]
When dM becomes distance function, M is called Kobayashi hyperbolic.
When dM becomes complete distance, M is called complete Kobayashi hyperbolic.
5.
When M =  is satisfied at dM , dM is equal to Poincaré distance.
6.
X is complex manifold.
M is contained in X as relative compact.

7.
[Definition]
What embedding  is hyperbolic embedding is defined by the next.
M is Kobayashi hyperbolic.
Arbitrary boundary points  .
 .
 .
8.
[Theorem, Kwack 1969]
When M is hyperbolicly embedding in X,
What arbitrary regular map  \{0}  is regularly connected to  .
9.
[Interpretation on 6,7,8,9]
X:= Language.
M:= Word.
:= Distance of word.
:= Connection of words.
10.
[Conjecture, Kobayashi]
(i) If d is  , degree d's general hypersurface X of  is Kobayashi hyperbolic.
(ii)If d is  ,  \  is hyperbolicly embedded in  .
11.
[Interpretation on 10.]X:= Language.
d:= Hierarchy of language.


Tokyo
February 3, 2012
At the Last Wintry Day of Classical Calendar in Japan
Sekinan Research Field of Language

Imaginary Language From Hyperbolic Space Language 2011

 Imaginary Language

Hyperbolic Space Language
TANAKA Akio

September 5, 2011

[Preparation]

3 dimensional hyperbolic space H3

Spherical surface at infinity Sx

Ideal simplex that has vertexes on Sx Σ

Internal angles of triangle that is projected to plane z = 0

Internal angles of ideal simplex α, β,γ

Internal angles except α, β,γ α1, β1,γ1

Volume of ideal simplex V

<Theorem>
V (Σ) = Λ(α) +Λ(β)+Λ(γ)

[Interpretation]
Language model is expressed by V (Σ).

Word is expressed by Σ.



© 2011 by The Sekinan Research Field of Language

Quantum Theory for Language Theoretical Summarization and Problem in Future 2004


Quantum Theory for Language   
Theoretical Summarization and Problem in Future
 
 
]1 Human being calls the real world by name.
2 Continuous calling by name generates a fixed essential object which is abstracted from the real world.
3 This object is called meaning.
4 Meaning forms representation of the real world for the daily use of repeatability.
5 Time is bestowed on meaning by the real world.
6 Time represents the real time of the real world.
7 Time has longitude.
Details see Prague Theory.8 Existence has eternal time. Example of existence is <sun>.
Act has long time. Example of act is<walk>.
Judgment has short time. Example of judgment is <at>.
9 Representation is simplified for the memory of human being as far as possible.
10 The simplification is formed to marking.
11 One case of marking is inscriptions on bines and tortoise carapaces in ancient China.
On Basis see Quantum Theory for Language Summary.
Details see Property of quantum.
12 This marking is called quantum.
13 A set of quanta forms language.
14 The generative and practical explain of this set of quanta is called <Quantum Theory for Language>.
15 Quantum has meaning and time by representation from the real world.
16 Meaning is newly generated from the compositeness of two or over two quanta.
Example is shown below.
Character /Ri/ means sun in English.
Character /yue/ means moon in English.
Character /ming/ is compounded from two character /ri/ and /yue/.
Character /ming/ means light in English.
17 Compositeness of quanta becomes new quantum.
18 New quantum has new meaning and new time.
19 New meaning is compounded from the meaning of pre-compounding quanta.
20 New meaning is more complicated from the meaning of pre-compounding quanta.
21 New time is compounded from the time of pre-compounding quanta.
22 New time is shorter than the time of pre-compounding quanta.
23 Quantum has direction toward the real world.
On Basis see Distance Theory.
Details see Direction.
This direction guarantees the reliance of language.
Details see Guarantee of Language.
24 Time of quanta gives influence to relationship between quanta.
25 Relation of two quanta is connection or separation.
26 Contiguity of two quanta has rules.
27 Main rules are connection rule and separation rule.
Details see Quantum Theory for Language Synopsis.
28 According to the rules word or sentence is generated.
Connection rule works while word is generated.
Separation rule works while sentence is generated.
29 Quantum goes toward the real world.
On Basis see Quantification of Quantum.
Details see, Place where Quantum of Language Exists, Core Quanta and Convergence of Quanta.
The root of going, see Reversion Theory, Warp Theory.
30 Quantum stops at the place near the real word.
This situation is called end of sentence.
31 Time of quanta is related with end of sentence.
This situation is expressed by the digitization of quanta.
End of sentence is expressed by the combination of digitization of sequence zero level.
Details see Direction.
31 Quantum sends information to the next quantum.
The situation of sending, see Sending and Receiving Information of Quantum.
The root of sending, see Warp Theory.32 For the verification of quantum’s movement, language model is adopted in the Quantum Theory for Language.
This model is called model simplified level, abbreviated to MSL.
Basis, see Model of Quantum Theory for Language.
33 For the application of the model simplified level, abbreviated to MSL, language machine is thinkable.
Basis, see Quantum Theory for Language Synopsis.
Method of machine, see Reconstruction of Information between Two Quanta.
Root of method, see Prague Theory 2. 
34 For the space where quanta exist, floor and orbit are supposed.
For rough sketch, see Place where Quantum of Language Exists.
35 The medium of two quanta which send and receive information is supposed to semi-electrical signals in the model.
For rough sketch, see Prague Theory Summary and Prospect.    
 
Tokyo November 28, 2004