Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word
TANAKA Akio
Synthesis
1 Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word
29/09/2013 19:25
For synthesis of meaning in word, Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word is proposed by cohomological expression.
1 Conjecture for synthesis of meaning in word
29/09/2013 19:25
For synthesis of meaning in word, Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word is proposed by cohomological expression.
2 Conjecture: Condition for synthesis of meaning in word
29/09/2013 18:38
On condition for synthesis of meaning in word, at conjecture is proposed by the next result of etale cohomology.
Result
——————————————————-Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.F: A -> A’
G: A’ -> A”
A and A’ have enough many injective objects.
If F transfers A’ s injective object to G acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.R ( G O F ) =~ RG O RF.
——————————————————–
ConjecturePreparation
Word is shown by R. This word is called old word.
Base meaning in word is shown by F.
Word that has base meaning is shown by RF.
Additional meaning to word is shown by G.
Word that has additional meaning is shown by RG. This word is called intermediate word.
Word that has base meaning and additional meaning is shown by R ( G O F ). This word is called new word.
Conjecture
For completion of new word, old word and intermediate word have the condition shown by the canonical natural equivalence of etale cohomology.
29/09/2013 18:38
On condition for synthesis of meaning in word, at conjecture is proposed by the next result of etale cohomology.
Result
——————————————————-Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.F: A -> A’
G: A’ -> A”
A and A’ have enough many injective objects.
If F transfers A’ s injective object to G acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.R ( G O F ) =~ RG O RF.
——————————————————–
ConjecturePreparation
Word is shown by R. This word is called old word.
Base meaning in word is shown by F.
Word that has base meaning is shown by RF.
Additional meaning to word is shown by G.
Word that has additional meaning is shown by RG. This word is called intermediate word.
Word that has base meaning and additional meaning is shown by R ( G O F ). This word is called new word.
Conjecture
For completion of new word, old word and intermediate word have the condition shown by the canonical natural equivalence of etale cohomology.
3 Canonical natural equivalence
29/09/2013 18:08Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.F: A -> A’
G: A’ -> A”
A and A’ have enough many injective objects.
If F transfers A‘s injective object to G acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.R ( G O F ) =~ RG O RF.
29/09/2013 18:08Canonical natural equivalence
The next two are left exact additional functors.F: A -> A’
G: A’ -> A”
A and A’ have enough many injective objects.
If F transfers A‘s injective object to G acyclic object, the next canonical natural equivalence is concluded.R ( G O F ) =~ RG O RF.
No comments:
Post a Comment